lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:43:28 +0200 From: Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org> To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> Cc: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com, suparna@...ibm.com, cmm@...ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fallocate system call On Fri, 27 April 2007 14:10:03 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > After long discussions where at least two possible implementations > were suggested that would work on _all_ architectures you chose one > which doesn't and causes extra effort. I believe the long discussion also showed that every possible implementation has drawbacks. To me this one appeared to be the best of many bad choices. Is this implementation worse than we thought? Jörn -- The grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for. -- Allan K. Chalmers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists