lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:14:20 +0400
From:	Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>
To:	Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@...ru>
CC:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: delayed allocatiou result in Oops

looks like an error in error handling path (notice -28 (ENOSPC) before)

thanks for the report, Alex

Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
> )
> 
> Simple test failed on ext4 when delayed allocation was used.
> #mkfs.ext3 -b4096 /dev/vzvg/test2
> #mount -text4dev /dev/vzvg/test2  /mnt/test -odelalloc
> #fsstress -d /mnt/test/ -l100  -n100000 -p20  -f dwrite=0
> 
> <CONSOLE LOG>
> EXT4-fs: writeback error = -28
> ......
> EXT4-fs: writeback error = -28
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000000 RIP: 
>  [<ffffffff802a12d2>] block_read_full_page+0xab/0x25f
> PGD 44c1067 PUD 44fd067 PMD 0 
> Oops: 0000 [2] SMP 
> CPU 0 
> Modules linked in: ext4dev jbd2
> Pid: 4833, comm: fsstress Not tainted 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 #9
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff802a12d2>]  [<ffffffff802a12d2>] block_read_full_page+0xab/0x25f
> RSP: 0018:ffff810004df9a58  EFLAGS: 00010203
> RAX: 0000000000001000 RBX: ffff8100cf4256f8 RCX: 000000000000000c
> 
> RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: ffff8100cf4256f8
> RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff810004df9be8 R09: ffff810004df9c58
> R10: 8888888888888888 R11: 8888888888888888 R12: 0000000000000052
> R13: 0000000000001000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000000000d3
> FS:  00002adfe3f7d6f0(0000) GS:ffffffff80730000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000004362000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process fsstress (pid: 4833, threadinfo ffff810004df8000, task ffff810004c867a0)
> Stack:  ffffffff880180f2 ffff8100054a23f0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>  ffff810005dcbb80 ffff81000549bf00 0000000000000000 ffff810005def8b0
>  ffffffff88029e60 ffffffff8025b2be ffff8100054da540 ffff8100cf496fb0
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff880180f2>] :ext4dev:ext4_get_block+0x0/0x109
>  [<ffffffff8025b2be>] find_get_page+0x21/0x51
>  [<ffffffff802a5b45>] do_mpage_readpage+0x45f/0x480
>  [<ffffffff880180f2>] :ext4dev:ext4_get_block+0x0/0x109
>  [<ffffffff88003d64>] :jbd2:jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x197/0x1be
>  [<ffffffff80245f3b>] bit_waitqueue+0x1c/0x99
>  [<ffffffff802a5bb4>] mpage_readpage+0x4e/0x67
>  [<ffffffff880180f2>] :ext4dev:ext4_get_block+0x0/0x109
>  [<ffffffff8028817e>] do_lookup+0x63/0x1ae
>  [<ffffffff8025b1ae>] file_read_actor+0x8d/0xf6
>  [<ffffffff8025b2be>] find_get_page+0x21/0x51
>  [<ffffffff8025b93a>] do_generic_mapping_read+0x23c/0x3da
>  [<ffffffff8025b121>] file_read_actor+0x0/0xf6
>  [<ffffffff8025d123>] generic_file_aio_read+0x119/0x156
>  [<ffffffff80281848>] do_sync_read+0xc9/0x10c
> 
>  [<ffffffff802845b2>] cp_new_stat+0xe5/0xfd
>  [<ffffffff80246007>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
>  [<ffffffff80281fba>] vfs_read+0xaa/0x132
>  [<ffffffff80282356>] sys_read+0x45/0x6e
>  [<ffffffff8020b41e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
> Code: 8b 45 00 a8 01 0f 85 e6 00 00 00 8b 45 00 a8 20 0f 85 c9 00 
> <CONSOLE LOG>
> 
> I've digged this a litle bit with folowig results:
> 
> int block_read_full_page(struct page *page, get_block_t *get_block)
> {
> ...
> 1914:	if (!page_has_buffers(page)) <<< page_has_buffers(page) == true 
> 		create_empty_buffers(page, blocksize, 0);
> 	head = page_buffers(page); <<<<  page_buffers(page) == NULL  
> <<<i've add debug info here:
> <<< page->flags == 100000000000821
> <<< PagePrivate(page) == 1, (page)->private == NULL
> <<< So we have private page without buffers, it is WRONG.
> 
> 	iblock = (sector_t)page->index << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - inode->i_blkbits);
> 	lblock = (i_size_read(inode)+blocksize-1) >> inode->i_blkbits;
> 	bh = head;
> 	nr = 0;
> 	i = 0;
> 
> 	do {
> 		if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) << Null pointer deref here result in oops
> .......
> }
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists