lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:06:51 +0530 From: Girish Shilamkar <girish@...sterfs.com> To: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...l.net> Cc: Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: performance testing On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 11:48 +0200, Valerie Clement wrote: > Shouldn't it be : > > struct commit_header *tmp = (struct commit_header*)(bh->b_data + i); > Ohhh, yes you are right. This is the correct thing to do. This patch which is been used has some endian-ness bugs. I had sent an updated patch for 2.6.22-rc5 on 19 June. I think we should be using the updated patch else it may break on big-endian machines. Even the updated patch has this bug i.e "struct commit_header *tmp =...." Thanks, Girish. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists