linux-ext4 - Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 2/5] i_version: Add hi 32 bit inode version on ext4 on-disk inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:30:47 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	cmm@...ibm.com
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 2/5] i_version: Add hi 32 bit inode version
 on ext4 on-disk inode

On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:37:16 -0400
Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com> wrote:

> This patch adds a 32-bit i_version_hi field to ext4_inode, which can be used for 64-bit inode versions. This field will store the higher 32 bits of the version, while Jean Noel's patch has added support to store the lower 32-bits in osd1.linux1.l_i_version.

Please wordwrap this changelog entry to less than 80 columns.  Well, less
than 258, anyway ;)

> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@...sterfs.com>
> ---
> Index: linux-2.6.21/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21.orig/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
> +++ linux-2.6.21/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
> @@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ struct ext4_inode {
>  	__le32  i_atime_extra;  /* extra Access time      (nsec << 2 | epoch) */
>  	__le32  i_crtime;       /* File Creation time */
>  	__le32  i_crtime_extra; /* extra FileCreationtime (nsec << 2 | epoch) */
> +	__le32	i_version_hi;	/* high 32 bits for 64-bit version */
>  };

Aren't there forward- backward-compatibility issues here?  How does the
filesystem driver work out whether this field is present and valid?

The changelog should describe this design issue.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html