linux-ext4 - Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:46:58 -0700
From:	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
To:	Kalpak Shah <kalpak@...sterfs.com>
Cc:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 12:35 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > 
> > Kalpak Shah wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
> > >> Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches.
> > >> I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are.  A link to a suitable
> > >> changlog for those patches would do in a pinch.  Preferable would be to
> > >> write a proper changelog for this patch.
> > > 
> > > The incremental patch contains a proper changelog describing the patch.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Instead of  putting incremental patches it would be nice if we can have replacement patches.
> > for the already existing patches with the comments addressed. For example if we have a 
> > review comment on the patch message ( commit log ) then adding an incremental patch doesn't help.
> 
> I think that it would be easier to review just the changes that have
> been made to the patches instead of having people go through the entire
> patch again. I was hoping that someone with write access to ext4-git
> would update the commit logs.
> 
> If replacement patches are preferred, then I will send them again.
> 

No need, I already fold your fix patch to the parent patches, so in the
updated ext4-patch-queue it saved the updated nanosecond patch.

> Thanks,
> Kalpak.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > -aneesh
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html