linux-ext4 - Re: Why the third parameter of "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" is _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:57:59 +0800
From:	"Yan Zheng" <yanzheng@...n.com>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why the third parameter of "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" is __u32?

sorry, I mean the fourth parameter of "ext4_ext_put_in_cache.

2007/7/26, Yan Zheng <yanzheng@...n.com>:
> Hi all
>
>   The third parameter of "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" is used to receive
> physical block number. I think the data type should be "ext4_fsblk_t".
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> YZ
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html