linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC] basic delayed allocation in VFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:29:09 +1000
From:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To:	Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>
Cc:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] basic delayed allocation in VFS

On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 04:09:20PM +0400, Alex Tomas wrote:
> David Chinner wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:51:56AM +0400, Alex Tomas wrote:
> >But this is really irrelevant - the issue at hand is what we want
> >for VFS level delalloc support. IMO, that mechanism needs to support
> >both XFS and ext4, and I'd prefer if it doesn't perpetuate the
> >bufferhead abuses of the past (i.e. define an iomap structure
> >instead of overloading bufferheads yet again).
> 
> I'm not sure I understand very well.

->get_blocks abuses bufferheads to provide an offset/length/state
mapping. That's all it needs. That what the iomap structure is used
for. It's smaller than a bufferhead, it's descriptive of it's use
and you don't get it confused with the other 10 ways bufferheads
are used and abused.

> where would you track uptodate, dirty and other states then?
> do you propose to separate block states from block mapping?

No. They still get tracked in the bufferheads attached to the page.
That's what bufferheads were originally intended for(*).

Cheers,

Dave.

(*) I recently proposed a separate block map tree for this rather
than using buffer heads for this because of the memory footprint of
N bufferheads per page on contiguous mappings. That's future work,
not something we really need to consider here. Chris Mason's extent
map tree patches are a start on this concept.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html