lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:07:08 +0200 From: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...l.net> To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Test results for ext4 Eric Sandeen wrote: > Oh, also for completeness can you specify which xfsprogs you used? > There were some recent changes made which affect the fs geometry, and > might affect the results. So it would be good to fully specify. OK, to do. To be honest, I didn't update them recently. > > Also why no fragmentation results for xfs or ext3? I only forgot to do it. But I didn't want to make a full comparaison of ext4 to xfs and ext3. When testing the latest ext4 patch queue with a new kernel, I'd got sometimes kernel crashes, or system hang, or bad performance. Running the same tests on ext3 and xfs for which the code is more stable I think gives me reference numbers for my tests. In this way, I found in the past a problem in the IO scheduler. Valérie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists