linux-ext4 - Re: kerneloops.org: 2.6.26-rc possible regression in ext3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:00:45 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: kerneloops.org: 2.6.26-rc possible regression in ext3

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> In the kerneloops.org stats, a new oops is rapidly climbing the charts.
> The oops is a page fault in the ext3 "do_slit" function, and the first
> report of it was with 2.6.26-rc6-git3.
> 
> It happens with various applications; the backtraces are at:
> 
> http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=do_split

Arjan, I was just looking at kerneloops last night, seeing the count for
this oops climb, and was wishing there were some way to annotate an oops
signature with more info.  If I could have tagged this with the RH
bugzilla nr. it might have saved a lot of time for folks.  Is this
feasible?  Or is finding the oops text in bugzilla the only way?

Thanks,

-Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html