linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix online resize with mballoc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:36:50 +0200
From:	Frédéric Bohé <frederic.bohe@...l.net>
To:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix online resize with mballoc

Thanks for your feedback !

Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:26 -0600, Andreas Dilger a écrit :
> On Jun 26, 2008  16:58 +0200, Fr�d�ric Boh� wrote:
> > From: Frederic Bohe <frederic.bohe@...l.net>
> > +	num_meta_group_infos_max = num_meta_group_infos +
> > +				le16_to_cpu(es->s_reserved_gdt_blocks);
> 
> The only drawback of NOT handling this properly is that once (eventually)
> we allow resizing with META_BG this code will be broken again.  It at
> least deserves a comment like "Need to handle this properly when META_BG
> resizing is allowed" so that it will show up on any grep for META_BG.
> 
> It probably also makes sense to round this up to the next power-of-two
> value, since kmalloc will do that internally anyways, and it gives us
> some resizing headroom for no cost.

Do you have any idea of how this headroom could be used in the future ?

Regards,
Fred





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html