[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:26:20 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Kalpak Shah <Kalpak.Shah@....COM>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][5/15] e2fsprogs-uninit-fixes.patch
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 04:01:10PM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> Bug fixes for uninit_bg feature:
> - display correct inode number during BG_INO_UNINIT and INOREF_IN_USED
> errors
> - restart e2fsck only once in case of above errors
> - initialize bitmaps properly considering whether block group is uninit
> or not (needed for e2freefrag)
>
> Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak.shah@....com>
> Bug fixes for uninit_bg feature:
> - display correct inode number during BG_INO_UNINIT and INOREF_IN_USED errors
> - restart e2fsck only once in case of above errors
> - initialize bitmaps properly considering uninit or not (needed for e2freefrag)
>
> Index: e2fsprogs-1.41.1/debugfs/set_fields.c
> ===================================================================
> --- e2fsprogs-1.41.1.orig/debugfs/set_fields.c
> +++ e2fsprogs-1.41.1/debugfs/set_fields.c
> @@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ void do_set_block_group_descriptor(int a
> }
>
> set_gd = current_fs->group_desc[set_bg];
> + set_sb = *current_fs->super;
>
> if (ss->func(ss, argv[3]) == 0) {
> current_fs->group_desc[set_bg] = set_gd;
Why is this needed? None of the table entries used by
set_block_group_descriptor requires set_sb to be set?
> Index: e2fsprogs-1.41.1/e2fsck/problem.c
> ===================================================================
> --- e2fsprogs-1.41.1.orig/e2fsck/problem.c
> +++ e2fsprogs-1.41.1/e2fsck/problem.c
> @@ -1301,12 +1301,12 @@ static struct e2fsck_problem problem_tab
>
> /* Inode found in group where _INODE_UNINIT is set */
> { PR_2_INOREF_BG_INO_UNINIT,
> - N_("@i %i found in @g %g where _INODE_UNINIT is set. "),
> + N_("@i %N found in @g %g where _INODE_UNINIT is set. "),
> PROMPT_FIX, PR_PREEN_OK },
>
> /* Inode found in group unused inodes area */
> { PR_2_INOREF_IN_UNUSED,
> - N_("@i %i found in @g %g unused inodes area. "),
> + N_("@i %N found in @g %g unused inodes area. "),
> PROMPT_FIX, PR_PREEN_OK },
>
This doesn't look right. %N prints pctx.num, which is set to the
directory entry's offset. It looks like %Di is the correct expansion,
and maybe something like this:
@E references @i %Di in @g %g where _INODE_UNINIT is set.\n
and
@E references @i %Di in @g %g unused inods area.\n
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists