| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 23:24:31 +0100 From: François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@...ablenet.be> To: Graham Murray <graham@...rray.org.uk> CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Wrong calculation of space remaining on a 32 bit system. Graham Murray a écrit : > "news.gmane.org" <francois.valenduc@...ablenet.be> writes: > >> In fact, the errors I mentionned don't occur anymore. But the problem of >> the diskspace remains. I never managed until now to use more than one >> third of a partition on a 32 bit system. After that, I always get a >> message saying that the partition is full, which can't be true. > > Just an idea, which I am sure you have already considered, but have you > run out of inodes? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > How can I know if I ran out of inodes ? I already tried 128 and 256 inode sizes but the problem occurs in both cases. As I said in my bug report, I found a patch dated from november 2007 which seems to adress the problem (see http://osdir.com/ml/file-systems.ext4/2007-11/msg00200.htm). Off course, I can't apply it any more now. But it seems this kind of problem still exists. I have no problem to use ext4 on a 64 bit systems with logical volumes having approximately the same size. François -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists