lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:30:12 -0500 From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> Cc: aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, sct@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@....com, stable@...nel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] Patch Upstream: ext4: Fix s_dirty_blocks_counter if block allocation failed with nodelalloc On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 03:47:48PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > Hi Ted and others, > > I see a bunch of ext4 / jbd2 patches were tagged as requested to go into > the -stable tree. But there seems to not be any simple way to determine > what order these patches should go in. > > Can someone please list the order of them, or resend all patches that > they request to go into the 2.6.28-stable tree (and 2.6.27 if some of > the patches apply there as well.) I'll put together git branches versus the 2.6.28-stable and 2.6.27-stable, hopefully in the next week or so. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists