[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:55:09 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, tytso@....edu,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "ext3: wait on all pending commits in ext3_sync_fs"
This reverts commit c87591b719737b4e91eb1a9fa8fd55a4ff1886d6.
Since journal_start_commit() is now fixed to return 1 when we
started a transaction commit, there's some transaction waiting to be
committed or there's a transaction already committing, we don't
need to call ext3_force_commit() in ext3_sync_fs(). Furthermore
ext3_force_commit() can unnecessarily create sync transaction which is
expensive so it's worthwhile to remove it when we can.
CC: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
fs/ext3/super.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext3/super.c b/fs/ext3/super.c
index b70d90e..4a97041 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/super.c
@@ -2428,12 +2428,13 @@ static void ext3_write_super (struct super_block * sb)
static int ext3_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
{
- sb->s_dirt = 0;
- if (wait)
- ext3_force_commit(sb);
- else
- journal_start_commit(EXT3_SB(sb)->s_journal, NULL);
+ tid_t target;
+ sb->s_dirt = 0;
+ if (journal_start_commit(EXT3_SB(sb)->s_journal, &target)) {
+ if (wait)
+ log_wait_commit(EXT3_SB(sb)->s_journal, target);
+ }
return 0;
}
--
1.6.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists