linux-ext4 - Re: [ltt-dev] LTTng 0.89 for Linux 2.6.29-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:44:56 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
Cc:	Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@...il.com>, ltt-dev@...ts.casi.polymtl.ca,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ltt-dev] LTTng 0.89 for Linux 2.6.29-rc3

On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:31:59PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Paul E. McKenney (paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 09:52:16PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> > > <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Are you using quilt to apply the patchset series file in the right order ?
> > > >
> > > > Ummm...  No.  I never have used quilt.
> > > >
> > > > Ah, there is a series file.  I guess it would not be too hard to make
> > > > an appropriate "sh" command:
> > > 
> > > How about trying?
> > > 
> > > #quilt push -a
> > 
> > Is the appropriate incantation as follows?
> > 
> > 	cd <top of git tree>
> > 	mkdir patches
> > 	cp /tmp/patch-2.6.29-rc3-lttng-0.92/* patches
> > 	quilt push -a
> > 
> 
> Yes, exactly.

Whew!  ;-)

> And from there you can follow the LTTng manual here :
> 
> http://ltt.polymtl.ca/svn/trunk/lttv/LTTngManual.html

I get some fuzz and the following:

	patching file kernel/trace/trace-clock-32-to-64.c
	Patch attempted to create file kernel/trace/trace-clock-32-to-64.c,
	which already exists.
	Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
	1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file
	kernel/trace/trace-clock-32-to-64.c

Should I be starting from somewhere other than v2.6.29-rc3?

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html