linux-ext4 - Re: Ext4 tree backports for 2.6.27.13 and 2.6.28.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:29:14 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ext4 tree backports for 2.6.27.13 and 2.6.28.2

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:25:39AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I've updated the ext4 backport branches on the ext4 git tree:
> 
>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git
>    http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git
> 
> The for-stable branch is branched off of 2.6.28.2, and has a candidate
> set of patches to be included in the next stable release.  The
> for-stable-2.6.27 branch is branched off of 2.6.27.13.  
> 
> I'm more confident with the 2.6.28 stable candidate than the 2.6.27
> stable candidates at the moment, but given that we just missed the
> 2.6.27.14 and 2.6.28.3 release cycles, that should give us plenty of
> time to test the patches.
> 
> 						- Ted
> 
> 
> 8556e8f3 18d5cb0 fd3bd090
>     ext4: Don't allow new groups to be added during block allocation
> 

This commit on for-stable-2.6.27 is not complete.
ac->alloc_semp is not assigned in the code.

-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html