[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:56:20 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ext3 latency fixes
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 19:34:12 +0200
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> > Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple.
>
> It's really not that simple, otherwise the schedulers would be much
> simpler. It's pretty easy to get good latency if you disregard any
> throughput concerns,
I'd be very interested in a scheduler like that.....
How much work would it be to make it ?
(if nothing else it would be a good number to have "should be within
50% of the perfect one for the tradeoff")
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists