lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2009 10:58:38 -0400
From:	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
CC:	Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@...il.com>,
	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux RAID <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is TRIM/DISCARD going to be a performance problem?

On 05/11/2009 10:50 AM, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:29:51AM -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>> The key is not at the FS layer - this is an issue for people who RAID
>> these beasts together and want to actually check that the bits are what
>> they should be (say doing a checksum validity check for a stripe).
>>
>
> Good point, yes I can see why they need that.  In that case, the
> storage device can't just silently truncate a TRIM request; it would
> have to expose to the OS its alignment requirements.  The risk though
> is that more they try push this compleixity into the OS, the higher
> the risk that the OS will simply decide not to take advantage of the
> functionality.  Of course, there is the question why anyone would want
> to build a software-raid device on top of a thin-provisioned hardware
> storage unit.  :-)
>
> 						- Ted


Probably not as uncommon as you would think, but not as you suggest to raid thin 
provisioned luns (those are done usually as RAID devices inside an array).

Think more of the array providing a thinly provisioned LUN made up out of T13 
TRIM enabled SSD's devices internally.  RAID makes sense here (data protection 
is still needed to avoid a single point of failure) and the relative expense of 
the SSD's devices makes "thin provisioning" really attractive to external users :-)

ric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ