linux-ext4 - [PATCH] ext4: Add WARN_ON on unmapped dirty buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 May 2009 13:57:44 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	cmm@...ibm.com, tytso@....edu, sandeen@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Add WARN_ON on unmapped dirty buffer_heads in writepage

Now we have block_lock_hole_extend clearing the dirty flag of
buffer_heads outside i_size we should not find buffer_heads
which are unmapped and dirty in writepage. If we find do a WARN_ON.
We can still continue because block_write_full page look at the mapped
flag only.

Following sequence of events would result in the above condition.
1) truncate(f, 1024)
2) mmap(f, 0, 4096)
3) a[0] = 'a'
4) truncate(f, 4096)
5) writepage(...)

After step 3 we would have unmapped buffer_heads outside i_size.
After step 4 we would have unmapped buffer_heads within i_size.

Now that truncate is calling block_lock_hole_extend which in turn
is clearing the dirty flag, we can safely assume that we won't
find unmapped dirty buffer_heads in write page. If we did find one
we should find out why.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c |   13 +++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index f6f2202..ca26bdd 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2509,6 +2509,11 @@ static int __ext4_journalled_writepage(struct page *page,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int ext4_bh_unmapped_and_dirty(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+	return (!buffer_mapped(bh)) && buffer_dirty(bh);
+}
+
 /*
  * Note that we don't need to start a transaction unless we're journaling data
  * because we should have holes filled from ext4_page_mkwrite(). We even don't
@@ -2622,6 +2627,14 @@ static int ext4_writepage(struct page *page,
 		/* now mark the buffer_heads as dirty and uptodate */
 		block_commit_write(page, 0, len);
 	}
+	/*
+	 * There should not be any unmapped and dirty
+	 * buffer_heads at this point. Look at block_lock_hole_extend
+	 * for more info. If we find one print more info
+	 */
+	 WARN(walk_page_buffers(NULL, page_bufs, 0, len, NULL,
+				 ext4_bh_unmapped_and_dirty),
+		 "Unmapped dirty buffer_heads found in %s\n", __func__);
 
 	if (PageChecked(page) && ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) {
 		/*
-- 
1.6.3.1.145.gb74d77

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html