linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 0/11] Fix page_mkwrite() for blocksize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 May 2009 11:36:01 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	npiggin@...e.de, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] Fix page_mkwrite() for blocksize < pagesize

  Hi,

On Wed 27-05-09 21:03:58, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > 
> > patches below are an attempt to solve problems filesystems have with
> > page_mkwrite() when blocksize < pagesize (see the changelog of the third patch
> > for details).
> > 
> > The series is against 2.6.30-rc7. The first two patches are just small cleanup
> > and should be merged separately (Ted should have the ext4 cleanup rebased on
> > top of current ext4 tree). For ext3 the fix is done in two phases, in the first
> > we make it to correctly allocate space at page-fault time from page_mkwrite().
> > This has the disadvantage that under random mmaped writes, the file gets much
> > more fragmented and performance of e.g. Berkeley DB drops by ~20%. Therefore
> > in the second phase I've implemented delayed allocation for ext3 and blocks
> > are just reserved during page_mkwrite time and really allocated only during
> > writepage. This gets the performance back to original numbers for me.
> > 
> > The patches should be fairly complete and sustained quite some testing. OTOH
> > the area is kind of complex so please review them so that they can get merged.
> > Thanks.
> 
> Can you move patch 7 and patch 11 as the last two patches. That would
> make sure we can push rest of the patches earlier. Rest of the patches
> are needed for ext4 to fix some of the bugs we are seeing. For eg:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12624
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13369
  OK, I think I can just move patches 3 and 5 to the beginning. That's all
that should be needed for ext4.

> I have few writepage patches also on top of your last series. Having
> patch 7 and patch 11 as last two patches make sure we can get the rest
> of the patches in ext4 patchqueue and get wider testing.
  Good point. I think Ted did the right thing and took just patches 3 and 5
to ext4 patch queue but I can reorder the patches for next time...

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html