lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:23:50 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH] libext2fs: Make ext2fs_extent_set_bmap() more robust against ENOSPC

In the case where we ext2fs_extent_set_bmap() is replacing the block
mapping at the beginning of an already-existing extent, insert a new
extent if necessary before shrinking an existing extent, to avoid data
loss if the disk is full.

This mostly addresses the problem described in Red Hat Bugzilla's
statistics are still wrong, but at least the files on the filesystem
are not corrupted.  If there is a failure during the
inode_scan_and_fix pass, the simplest thing to do may be to tell the
user to run e2fsck -fy.

Addresses-Red-Hat-Bug: #510379

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
---
 lib/ext2fs/extent.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/extent.c b/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
index 4a4fd2c..2f280ea 100644
--- a/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
+++ b/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
@@ -1270,24 +1270,44 @@ again:
 #ifdef DEBUG
 		printf("(re/un)mapping first block in extent\n");
 #endif
+		if (physical) {
+			retval = ext2fs_extent_get(handle, 
+						   EXT2_EXTENT_PREV_LEAF,
+						   &extent);
+			if (extent.e_flags & EXT2_EXTENT_FLAGS_UNINIT)
+				extent_uninit = 1;
+			if (retval == EXT2_ET_EXTENT_NO_PREV) {
+				retval = ext2fs_extent_insert(handle,
+							      0, &newextent);
+			} else if (retval)
+				goto done;
+			else if ((logical == extent.e_lblk + extent.e_len) &&
+				 (physical == extent.e_pblk + extent.e_len) &&
+				 (new_uninit == extent_uninit) &&
+				 ((int) extent.e_len < max_len-1)) {
+				extent.e_len++;
+				retval = ext2fs_extent_replace(handle, 0,
+							       &extent);
+			} else {
+				retval = ext2fs_extent_insert(handle,
+				      EXT2_EXTENT_INSERT_AFTER, &newextent);
+			}
+			if (retval)
+				goto done;
+		}
+		retval = ext2fs_extent_fix_parents(handle);
+		if (retval)
+			goto done;
+		retval = ext2fs_extent_get(handle, EXT2_EXTENT_NEXT_LEAF,
+					   &extent);
+		if (retval)
+			goto done;
 		extent.e_pblk++;
 		extent.e_lblk++;
 		extent.e_len--;
 		retval = ext2fs_extent_replace(handle, 0, &extent);
 		if (retval)
 			goto done;
-		if (physical) {
-			/*
-			 * We've removed the old block, now rely on
-			 * the optimized hueristics for adding a new
-			 * mapping with appropriate merging if necessary.
-			 */
-			goto again;
-		} else {
-			retval = ext2fs_extent_fix_parents(handle);
-			if (retval)
-				goto done;
-		}
 	} else {
 		__u32	orig_length;
 
-- 
1.6.3.2.1.gb9f7d.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists