linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] Fix ext2fs_set_gdt_csum() to use access functions.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Sep 2009 01:11:10 -0400
From:	Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@...com>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	nicholas.dokos@...com, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
	Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@...il.com>,
	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ext2fs_set_gdt_csum() to use access functions.

Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:

> > 
> > Replace all field accesses with calls to access functions.
> > Most importantly, get rid of the mis-declared group descriptor
> > pointer which caused the wrong fields to be updated.
> 
> Not quite sure what you mean by this?  It worked ok for the "old" size ...
> 

Yes, it worked fine for the old ext2_group_desc structure, but it has no
hope of working with the ext4_group_desc: the sizes are different, so
doing bg++ gets it pointing somewhere within the first descriptor, not
to the beginning of the second. That's how it ended up modifying
reserved fields.

Sorry about the whitespace problems.  As for the flags, I didn't worry
too much about how to set them: I figured that once the dust settles,
we'll follow the proper convention.

Thanks for looking it over and testing too! We'll see whether Justin's
problem disappears.

Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html