linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 08/27] BKL: Remove BKL from ext4 filesystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:45:01 -0500
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/27] BKL: Remove BKL from ext4 filesystem

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:04:48AM +0100, Jan Blunck wrote:
> The BKL is still used in ext4_put_super(), ext4_fill_super() and
> ext4_remount(). All three calles are protected against concurrent calls by
> the s_umount rw semaphore of struct super_block.
> 
> Therefore the BKL is protecting nothing in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>

Acked-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html