linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Use slab allocator for sub-page sized allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:48:08 -0500
From:	Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
To:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Use slab allocator for sub-page sized
	allocations

On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 08:14:11PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Now that the SLUB seems to be fixed so that it respects the requested
> alignment, use kmem_cache_alloc() to allocator if the block size of
> the buffer heads to be allocated is less than the page size.
> Previously, we were using 16k page on a Power system for each buffer,
> even when the file system was using 1k or 4k block size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>

Heh funny you should bring this up, we just fixed a problem in RHEL5 related to
using slabs.  If you have a non-jbd based root filesystem and then mount a bunch
of jbd-based fs's at the same time you will race with the cache creation stuff
and end up getting errors about creating the same slab cache multiple times.
The way this was fixed in RHEL5 was to put a mutex around the slabcache creation
and deletion so this sort of race.  It seems that this patch has the same issue
as the 2.6.18 jbd had.  Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html