| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:32:12 +0000 From: Chris Puttick <cputtick@...il.com> To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Practical partition/volume size limitation Hi all Sorry to intrude and please feel free to redirect me to another more appropriate list or alternative source (which I have been unable to find). We're considering a large-scale filestore deployment (starting with 32TB, single volume) and some team members have concerns about the practical scalability of ext4 e.g. time to run fsck. So some questions :) Are there any examples of organisations running ext4 with large-scale filestores? What sort of sizes? What issues, if any, have been encountered? And if not ext4, what else (assuming a Linux preference)? Thanks in advance. Chris Puttick -- My employers website: http://thehumanjourney.net - opinions in this email are however very much my own and may not reflect that of my current employer, past employers, associates, friends, family, pets etc.. Documents attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format: http://iso26300.info -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists