linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: memory leakage in ext4_mb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:27:26 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	jing zhang <zj.barak@...il.com>, tytso@....edu
Cc:	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: memory leakage in ext4_mb_init()

On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:47:39 +0800, jing zhang <zj.barak@...il.com> wrote:
> 2010/3/22, tytso@....edu <tytso@....edu>:
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:01:06PM +0800, jing zhang wrote:
> >> From: Jing Zhang <zj.barak@...il.com>
> >>
> >> Date: Sun Mar 21 21:59:35     2010
> >>
> >> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> >> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
> >> Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <zj.barak@...il.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> --- linux-2.6.32/fs/ext4/mballoc.c	2009-12-03 11:51:22.000000000 +0800
> >> +++ ext4_mm_leak/mballoc3.c	2010-03-21 21:37:18.000000000 +0800
> >> @@ -2360,6 +2360,24 @@ err_freesgi:
> >>  	return -ENOMEM;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +static void ext4_mb_destroy_backend(struct super_block *sb)
> >> +{
> >> +	ext4_group_t ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
> >> +	ext4_group_t i;
> >> +	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
> >> +	int j;
> >> +	int num_meta_group_infos = (ngroups + EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb) -1)
> >> +					>> EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK_BITS(sb);
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++)
> >> +		kfree(ext4_get_group_info(sb, i));
> >> +
> >> +	for (j = 0; j < num_meta_group_infos; j++)
> >> +		kfree(sbi->s_group_info[j]);
> >> +
> >> +	kfree(sbi->s_group_info);
> >> +	iput(sbi->s_buddy_cache);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >
> > It would be better if this could be done by making ext4_mb_release()
> > more flexible, and then calling ext4_mb_release() if there is an error
> > setting up the data structures in ext4_mb_init().
> >
> > 						- Ted
> >
> 
> Yeah, Ted, going through ext4_mb_release() is clearer.
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/linux-2.6.32/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/ext4_mm_leak/mballoc3.c
> index bba1282..99ca2de 100644
> --- a/linux-2.6.32/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/ext4_mm_leak/mballoc3.c
> @@ -2417,8 +2417,7 @@ int ext4_mb_init(struct super_block *sb, int
> needs_recovery)
> 
>  	sbi->s_locality_groups = alloc_percpu(struct ext4_locality_group);
>  	if (sbi->s_locality_groups == NULL) {
> -		kfree(sbi->s_mb_offsets);
> -		kfree(sbi->s_mb_maxs);
> +		ext4_mb_release(sb);

We may want to make sure that we can safely call ext4_mb_release that
early. what i would suggest is to move s_locality_group allocation
before ext4_mb_init. that makes error handling easy



>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> @@ -2511,7 +2510,8 @@ int ext4_mb_release(struct super_block *sb)
>  				atomic_read(&sbi->s_mb_discarded));
>  	}
> 
> -	free_percpu(sbi->s_locality_groups);
> +	if (sbi->s_locality_groups)
> +		free_percpu(sbi->s_locality_groups);
>  	if (sbi->s_proc)
>  		remove_proc_entry("mb_groups", sbi->s_proc);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html