lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 22:11:01 -0400 From: tytso@....edu To: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...cle.com> Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Alessandro Polverini <alex@...bles.it>, Christoph Biedl <bugzilla.kernel.bpeb@...chmal.in-ulm.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] resize: check s_log_groups_per_flex before accessing flex groups On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 09:14:07AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On 2010-03-27, at 13:32, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >#13549, Kernel oops while online resizing of an ext4 filesystem > > > >if groups_per_flex < 2, sbi->s_flex_groups[] doesn't get filled out, > >and every other access to this first tests s_log_groups_per_flex; > >same thing needs to happen in resize or we'll wander off into > >a null pointer. > > Does it even make sense to set INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG if we only have a > single group per flexbg? That is just a normal filesystem then. > That would be a separate bug in mke2fs. Yes, it does make sense to set flex_bg in this case; it allows the group metadata to be stored outside of a blockgroup, which is helpful to e2fsck in some cases when it needs to relocate an inode table and there's no contiguous free space available in the block group. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists