linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/4] block: Implement a blk_yield function to voluntarily give up the I/O scheduler.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:49:22 -0400
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] block: Implement a blk_yield function to voluntarily give up the I/O scheduler.

Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 14 2010, Vivek Goyal wrote:

>> > @@ -1887,6 +1891,9 @@ static void cfq_dispatch_insert(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>> >  
>> >  	cfqd->rq_in_flight[cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq)]++;
>> >  	cfqq->nr_sectors += blk_rq_sectors(rq);
>> > +
>> > +	if (cfq_cfqq_yield(cfqq) && RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&cfqq->sort_list))
>> > +		cfq_yield_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq);
>> 
>> Jeff,
>> 
>> I am wondering if cfq_select_queue() will be a better place for yielding
>> the queue.
>> 
>> 	if (cfq_cfqq_yield(cfqq) && RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&cfqq->sort_list))
>> 			goto expire;
>> 
>> We can avoid one unnecessary __blk_run_queue().
>
> Agree, doing it on insert is not the right place.

I see where you're coming from, but that makes things quite a bit
trickier.  I look forward to the review of *that* patch.  ;-)

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html