lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:07:07 +0200
From:	Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>
To:	Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>
Cc:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Driver <Linux-Driver@...gic.com>,
	Thomas Helle <Helle@...bingen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: ext4: (2.6.34-rc4): This should not happen!!  Data will be lost

On 09:36, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> > > 	qla2xxx 0000:06:09.0: scsi(0:0:0): Abort command issued -- 1 fa6a73 2002.
> > > 
> > > I can't explain why the storage did not complete the request in the
> > > allotted time.
> > 
> > Ah, that's valuable information, thanks. The underlying Infortrend
> > Raid System is rather old but worked without any problems for several
> > years. We recently replaced its 400G disks by new 2T WD disks. Maybe
> > the new disks have longer response times, could that be the reason? And
> > is there a way to increase the timeout value?
> 
> To update the default timeout value (30 seconds) for commands
> submitted to /dev/sdn to 60 seconds:
> 
>         $ echo 60 > /sys/block/sdn/device/timeout

I will re-run the stress test with a 60 seconds timeout value and follow
up if this did not help.

Thanks again
Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ