lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 31 May 2010 19:55:58 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	jack@...e.cz, tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nobh mount option in ext3/4?

On Mon 31-05-10 14:40:51, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> ext3 and ext4 heave inherited the nobh option from ext2, but the
> implementation is rather interesting.  Except for the usual
> option parsing / display it's only respected in
> ext3_writeback_writepage/ext4_writepage and the truncate_page
> implementation.  Given that we don't take any more than usual
> care to not create buffers heads during read this is not going
> to effect a whole lot.
> 
> Is there a good reason to keep these options and the associated
> code complexity?  I'd be rather surprised if it gets any sufficient
> testing..
  IMHO nobh can go away from ext3/ext4. I would be also in favor of
removing all the nobh logic from VFS and ext2 but for ext2 it saves some
low memory so some people might actually use it.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ