linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: don't print scary messages for allocation failures post-abort

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:56:16 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: don't print scary messages for allocation
 failures post-abort

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 02:33:40PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I often get emails containing the "This should not happen!!" message,
> conveniently trimmed to remove things like:
> 
> sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Unhandled error code
> sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_TIMEOUT
> sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] CDB: Write(10): 2a 00 03 13 c9 70 00 00 28 00
> end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 51628400
> Aborting journal on device dm-0-8.
> EXT4-fs error (device dm-0): ext4_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal
> EXT4-fs (dm-0): Remounting filesystem read-only
> 
> I don't think there is any value to the verbosity if the reason is
> due to a filesystem abort; it just obfuscates the root cause.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>

I've added this patch to the ext4 patch queue, thanks.

     	   	      	     	  	- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html