linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] jbd2: Use atomic variables to avoid taking t_handle_lock in jbd2_journal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:06:09 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Keith Maanthey <kmannth@...ibm.com>,
	Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: Use atomic variables to avoid taking
 t_handle_lock in jbd2_journal_stop

On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:02:32PM -0700, john stultz wrote:
> >From these numbers, it looks like the atomic variables are a minor
> improvement for -rt, but the improvement isn't as drastic as the earlier
> j_state lock change, or the vfs scalability patchset.

Thanks for doing this quick test run!  I was expecting to see a more
dramatic difference, since the j_state_lock patch removed one of the
two global locks in jbd2_journal_stop, and the t_handle_lock patch
removed the second of the two global locks.  But I guess the
j_state_lock contention in start_this_handle() is still the dominating factor.

It's interesting that apparently the latest t_handle_lock patch
doesn't seem to make much difference unless the VFS scalability patch
is also applied.  I'm not sure why that makes a difference, but it's
nice to know that with the VFS scalability patch it does seem to help,
even if it doesn't help as much as I had hoped.

OK, I guess we'll have to start working on the more aggressive
scalability fix ups....

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html