linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH -v2 0/6] ext4: use the bio layer directly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:03:39 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/6] ext4: use the bio layer directly

On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 04:40:14PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> This set of patches passes xfstests for both 1k and 4k block sizes.  For
> streaming I/O writes, it reduces the number of block I/O queue
> submissions by a factor of 1024 in the ideal case.  (i.e., instead of
> submitting 4k requests at a time, we can now submit up to 512k writes at
> a time, a 128 factor of improvement.)

Sigh, this paragraph isn't quite right.  Let me reword:

This set of patches passes xfstests for both 1k and 4k block sizes.  For
streaming I/O writes, it reduces the number of block I/O queue
submissions by a factor of 128 in the ideal case.  (i.e., instead of
submitting 4k requests at a time, we can now submit up to 512k writes at
a time.)

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html