linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:50:08 +0100
From:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To:	Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
Cc:	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>,
	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, tytso@....edu,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, sandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate
 super_operation

On 2010.11.18 at 16:45 -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 10-11-18 02:32 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> >On 2010.11.18 at 18:05 +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> >>Online trim may be slow, but offline would be awfully inconvenient
> >>when an fs is big and needed for a live system, or when it's your root fs.
> >
> >You can call FITRIM from a running system. Infact I run it once per week
> >as a cron job on my (mounted) root fs.
> 
> 
> Ditto for wiper.sh.

But I always thought that wiper has no access to the filesystem
internals. So there is always a chance that you write to a sector that
wiper.sh is currently trimming. FITRIM should be safer in this regard.

-- 
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html