| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:57:48 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, tytso <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super_operation On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:53:52AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > On 10-11-19 09:40 AM, Chris Mason wrote: > > > >We've been told that online and constant trimming is the default in > >windows7. The ssds are most likely to just start ignoring the trims > >they can't service efficiently. > > Win7 collects multiple TRIM ranges over time and batches them as single TRIMs > (as reported to me by an SSD vendor who traced it with a SATA analyzer, > and who also apparently has "inside info"). I really hate to rely on this third party hearsay (from all sides), and have implement TRIM support in qemu now. I'll soon install win7 and will check out the TRIM patters myself. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists