linux-ext4 - Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Drop ext2/ext3 codebase? When?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:28:37 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Drop ext2/ext3 codebase? When?

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:58:45PM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> -lsf-pc, -linux-fsdevel
> 
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 09:00:58PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > Yes, of course. Upgraders won't be the ones using snapshots.
> > My intension was to state that those people installing new systems to test
> > snapshots would be functioning as testers for "ext3 mode", because:
> > 1. when no snapshots exists it boils down to testing "ext3 mode".
> > 2. it is unlikely that snapshots will mask "ext3 mode" bugs.
> > 
> > So my claim is that "ext3 mode" would benefit from a transition
> > period in which snapshots and (extens,delalloc) are mutually
> > exclusive in ext4.
> 
> Here are the requirements that I think are critical before we do this:
> 
> 1) We need to solve the testing matrix problem.  Right now "ext3 mode"
> in ext4 doesn't get enough testing as it is.  Part of the solution is
> (a) deciding on the modes that need testing, and (b) writing some
> shell scripts so that xfstests can be automatically run in all of the
> right modes.  And then it will be having some number of people
> (hopefully not just me) running said tests and reporting failures.

What scripts are needed? xfstests has the $MKFS_OPTIONS and
$MOUNT_OPTIONS environment variables for customising your mkfs and
mount parameters for each test run, so isn't testing ext3
filesystems with the ext4 code should just be a matter of setting
these appropriately?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html