lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:57:52 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
CC:	XFS <xfs@....sgi.com>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xfstests: failure to umount ext4

On 3/23/11 9:36 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've been running xfstests on ext4 and I always get annoying failures to umount:
>>
>> 213 8s ... 31s
>> umount: /mnt/test/ext4: device is busy.
>>        (In some cases useful info about processes that use
>>         the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1))
>>
>> post 198 mostly fails to umount as well.
>> and post 124 always fails to umount.
>>
>> My server is Ubuntu 10.10, running kernel 2.6.38.
>>
>> Is there any known issue about this? because I could find it on google
>> or on the XFS list.
>>
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Has anyone seen these failures when running xfstests on ext4?
> My test and scratch partitions are dedicated for xfstests.

I've not seen it, can you investigate with lsof etc?

They both work for me on a quick test, anyway, on a .38
kernel.

What are you using for your partitions under test?
 
-Eric

> Thanks,
> Amir.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ