linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4:Fix credits computing for indirect mapped files.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:39:35 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4:Fix credits computing for indirect mapped files.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:10:05PM +0800, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
> Either the first block or the last one could be not aligned with
> block boundary, 1 block is needed to fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>

Thanks for the patch submission!

I further modified the patch to make the commit description a bit
clearer, and to fix an additional bug that I noticed while reviewing
your patch.

					- Ted

>From fa0dfea6882a833a70f04b3089a751f75c0d03f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:38:38 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix credits computing for indirect mapped files

When writing a contiguous set of blocks, two indirect blocks could be
needed depending on how the blocks are aligned, so we need to increase
the number of credits needed by one.

[ Also fixed a another bug which could further underestimate the
  number of journal credits needed by 1; the code was using integer
  division instead of DIV_ROUND_UP() -- tytso]

Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c |   11 +++++------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 1a86282..7d11e02 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -5398,13 +5398,12 @@ static int ext4_indirect_trans_blocks(struct inode *inode, int nrblocks,
 	/* if nrblocks are contiguous */
 	if (chunk) {
 		/*
-		 * With N contiguous data blocks, it need at most
-		 * N/EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(inode->i_sb) indirect blocks
-		 * 2 dindirect blocks
-		 * 1 tindirect block
+		 * With N contiguous data blocks, we need at most
+		 * N/EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(inode->i_sb) + 1 indirect blocks,
+		 * 2 dindirect blocks, and 1 tindirect block
 		 */
-		indirects = nrblocks / EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(inode->i_sb);
-		return indirects + 3;
+		return DIV_ROUND_UP(nrblocks,
+				    EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(inode->i_sb)) + 4;
 	}
 	/*
 	 * if nrblocks are not contiguous, worse case, each block touch
-- 
1.7.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html