| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:16:13 +0100 From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> To: Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@...il.com> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...ell.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, colin.king@...onical.com, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [BUG] fatal hang untarring 90GB file, possibly writeback related. On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:38:09AM +0530, Raghavendra D Prabhu wrote: > * On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:29:57AM -0500, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote: > >On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 15:35 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > >>On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:01:04AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 11:21 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > >>> > I really would like to hear if the fix makes a big difference or > >>> > if we need to consider forcing SLUB high-order allocations bailing > >>> > at the first sign of trouble (e.g. by masking out __GFP_WAIT in > >>> > allocate_slab). Even with the fix applied, kswapd might be waking up > >>> > less but processes will still be getting stalled in direct compaction > >>> > and direct reclaim so it would still be jittery. > > >>> "the fix" being this > > >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/5/121 > > > >>Drop this for the moment. It was a long shot at best and there is little > >>evidence the problem is in this area. > > >>I'm attaching two patches. The first is the NO_KSWAPD one to stop > >>kswapd being woken up by SLUB using speculative high-orders. The second > >>one is more drastic and prevents slub entering direct reclaim or > >>compaction. It applies on top of patch 1. These are both untested and > >>afraid are a bit rushed as well :( > > > >Preliminary results with both patches applied still show kswapd > >periodically going up to 99% but it doesn't stay there, it comes back > >down again (and, obviously, the system doesn't hang). > > > >This is sysrq-M from a couple of times when it went up there: > > > >[ 426.736958] SysRq : Show Memory > >[ 426.736974] Mem-Info: > >[ 426.736977] Node 0 DMA per-cpu: > >[ 426.736983] CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 426.736986] CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 426.736989] CPU 2: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 426.736993] CPU 3: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 426.736996] Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu: > >[ 426.737002] CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 169 > >[ 426.737005] CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 40 > >[ 426.737009] CPU 2: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 166 > >[ 426.737012] CPU 3: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 168 > >[ 426.737015] Node 0 Normal per-cpu: > >[ 426.737020] CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 426.737024] CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 426.737027] CPU 2: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 426.737030] CPU 3: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 426.737036] active_anon:108658 inactive_anon:37031 isolated_anon:0 > >[ 426.737037] active_file:32006 inactive_file:41051 isolated_file:32 > >[ 426.737038] unevictable:8 dirty:41202 writeback:204 unstable:0 > >[ 426.737039] free:191520 slab_reclaimable:8490 slab_unreclaimable:27477 > >[ 426.737039] mapped:9176 shmem:26412 pagetables:5427 bounce:0 > >[ 426.737051] Node 0 DMA free:8140kB min:548kB low:684kB high:820kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:12kB active_file:240kB inactive_file:7280kB unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:15676kB mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:180kB slab_unreclaimable:16kB kernel_stack:0kB pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no > >[ 426.737064] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 1856 1862 1862 > >[ 426.737078] Node 0 DMA32 free:757892kB min:66820kB low:83524kB high:100228kB active_anon:434632kB inactive_anon:148112kB active_file:127784kB inactive_file:156924kB unevictable:32kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:1901408kB mlocked:32kB dirty:164808kB writeback:816kB mapped:36704kB shmem:105648kB slab_reclaimable:33676kB slab_unreclaimable:108372kB kernel_stack:2304kB pagetables:21708kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:160 all_unreclaimable? no > >[ 426.737092] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 5 5 > >[ 426.737106] Node 0 Normal free:48kB min:212kB low:264kB high:316kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:6060kB mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:104kB slab_unreclaimable:1520kB kernel_stack:176kB pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes > >[ 426.737119] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 > >[ 426.737132] Node 0 DMA: 3*4kB 2*8kB 1*16kB 1*32kB 2*64kB 2*128kB 2*256kB 2*512kB 2*1024kB 2*2048kB 0*4096kB = 8140kB > >[ 426.737174] Node 0 DMA32: 945*4kB 585*8kB 6469*16kB 4871*32kB 3189*64kB 1338*128kB 228*256kB 58*512kB 24*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 757884kB > >[ 426.737227] Node 0 Normal: 2*4kB 5*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 48kB > >[ 426.737257] 99595 total pagecache pages > >[ 426.737260] 0 pages in swap cache > >[ 426.737263] Swap cache stats: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0 > >[ 426.737266] Free swap = 3768316kB > >[ 426.737268] Total swap = 3768316kB > >[ 426.744603] 525808 pages RAM > >[ 426.744612] 57618 pages reserved > >[ 426.744614] 141551 pages shared > >[ 426.744617] 186065 pages non-shared > >[ 472.301810] SysRq : Show Memory > >[ 472.301826] Mem-Info: > >[ 472.301829] Node 0 DMA per-cpu: > >[ 472.301835] CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 472.301839] CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 472.301842] CPU 2: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 472.301845] CPU 3: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 472.301848] Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu: > >[ 472.301854] CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 184 > >[ 472.301857] CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 46 > >[ 472.301860] CPU 2: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 158 > >[ 472.301863] CPU 3: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 163 > >[ 472.301866] Node 0 Normal per-cpu: > >[ 472.301871] CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 472.301874] CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 472.301878] CPU 2: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 472.301881] CPU 3: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 > >[ 472.301886] active_anon:107673 inactive_anon:37031 isolated_anon:0 > >[ 472.301887] active_file:31533 inactive_file:33323 isolated_file:32 > >[ 472.301888] unevictable:8 dirty:26256 writeback:6475 unstable:0 > >[ 472.301889] free:198742 slab_reclaimable:9347 slab_unreclaimable:28647 > >[ 472.301889] mapped:8307 shmem:26412 pagetables:5427 bounce:0 > >[ 472.301901] Node 0 DMA free:8140kB min:548kB low:684kB high:820kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:12kB active_file:240kB inactive_file:7280kB unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:15676kB mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:180kB slab_unreclaimable:16kB kernel_stack:0kB pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no > >[ 472.301915] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 1856 1862 1862 > >[ 472.301928] Node 0 DMA32 free:786780kB min:66820kB low:83524kB high:100228kB active_anon:430692kB inactive_anon:148112kB active_file:125892kB inactive_file:126012kB unevictable:32kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):128kB present:1901408kB mlocked:32kB dirty:105024kB writeback:25900kB mapped:33228kB shmem:105648kB slab_reclaimable:37104kB slab_unreclaimable:113052kB kernel_stack:2288kB pagetables:21708kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:3196 all_unreclaimable? no > >[ 472.301943] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 5 5 > >[ 472.301956] Node 0 Normal free:48kB min:212kB low:264kB high:316kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:6060kB mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:104kB slab_unreclaimable:1520kB kernel_stack:176kB pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes > >[ 472.301968] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 > >[ 472.301982] Node 0 DMA: 3*4kB 2*8kB 1*16kB 1*32kB 2*64kB 2*128kB 2*256kB 2*512kB 2*1024kB 2*2048kB 0*4096kB = 8140kB > >[ 472.302015] Node 0 DMA32: 6121*4kB 1912*8kB 5094*16kB 4920*32kB 3168*64kB 1381*128kB 262*256kB 68*512kB 24*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 786756kB > >[ 472.302048] Node 0 Normal: 2*4kB 5*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 48kB > >[ 472.302090] 91312 total pagecache pages > >[ 472.302093] 0 pages in swap cache > >[ 472.302096] Swap cache stats: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0 > >[ 472.302099] Free swap = 3768316kB > >[ 472.302102] Total swap = 3768316kB > >[ 472.309521] 525808 pages RAM > >[ 472.309529] 57618 pages reserved > >[ 472.309548] 142496 pages shared > >[ 472.309551] 177182 pages non-shared > > > >I'll finish off this verification, and then re-run with the watch-highorder script running. > > > >James > Hi, > > I saw similar lockups while doing a heavy copy routine (basically > copying an entire partition). I don't think this may be related to > ext4, since the source and destination filesystems were btrfs and > xfs. > If you have SLUB configured, can you try again with the same two patches I attached earlier in the thread please? > <SNIP> > > The mv was basically frozen though after sometime it resumed. I also noticed that levels of dirty data were really high (=~ 1G) which I presumed may have caused this. > Is 1G higher than what /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio should allow? -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists