linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: fix possible use-after-free ext4_remove_li

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 May 2011 13:42:41 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: fix possible use-after-free
 ext4_remove_li_request()

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:39:46PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:16:34PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> > 
> > I already did send it as a separate patch series with the version
> > description.
> 
> What, you mean the -v2 patch series?
> 
> 
> So let me rephrase the question:  Is -v2 your final answer?

Ah, never mind.  I got confused when with the other patch series where
half the patches where -v3, and the other half were -v2.  It makes
what shows up in patchwork hard to follow.  In the future, please bump
the version number on the entire series, not just on individual
patches, as it makes it a lot easier for me to track what is going
on....

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html