linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: invalidate gap cache when writing extents last block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 May 2011 17:33:42 +0900
From:	Kazuya Mio <k-mio@...jp.nec.com>
To:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: invalidate gap cache when writing extents last
 block

Hi Lukas,
How do you think about my comment?

Regards,
Kazuya Mio

2011/05/13 17:55, Kazuya Mio wrote:
> 2011/05/13 15:36, Lukas Czerner wrote:
>> That is because due to defensive programming we planted a lot of
>> BUG_ON's to prevent the length of the gap cache to be zero, but in this
>> case it actually will be zero, because there will be no gap at the end
>> of the file.
> 
> Um, I think there is a block (blocksize -1 byte) in gap.
> And this gap should be used for the next block searching.
> According to ext4_ext_in_cache(), len=0 means the special case
> which we have no cache extent, so len=0 should be disallowed.
> 
> Moreover, if we create the file which has 2^32-1 offset,
> we can't get extent which starts from this offset with FIEMAP ioctl.
> That's why I think the maximum file size should be 2^32-1 * blocksize.
> 
> Regards,
> Kazuya Mio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html