linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ext4: arrange ext4_*

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:04:40 +0900
From:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To:	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc:	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ext4: arrange ext4_*_bit() macros

2011/6/2 Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>:
> FYI, one of the snapshot patches (snapshot_exclude_bitmap.patch)
> uses ext4_set_bit_atomic() to set bits in the exclude bitmap when
> moving blocks to snapshot file.
> Since moving blocks is not done in allocation context, there is no
> buddy/group lock held while manipulating the exclude bitmap.
> So I would appreciate if this specific macro will not be removed.
>
> Thanks, Yongqiang , for pointing that out.

OK, I'll keep ext4_*_bit_atomic() in the next version.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html