linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] jbd2: Fix oops in jbd2_journal_remove_journal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:41:13 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: Fix oops in jbd2_journal_remove_journal_head()

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 09:31:42PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 06-06-11 10:16:30, Ted Tso wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 05:12:58PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > >  /*
> > > - * For the unlocked version of this call, also make sure that any
> > > - * hanging journal_head is cleaned up if necessary.
> > > + * For the unlocked version of this call, also drop buffer_head reference.
> > >   *
> > >   * __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer is usually called as part of a single locked
> >      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > 
> > Doesn't this paragraph refer to jbd2_journal_refile_buffer(), not
> > __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer()?  Or am I missing something?
>   Hmm, the comment seems to be wrong. The comment about buffer_head
> reference does not apply anymore. I'll fix that.


Are you going to be sending me a new version of this patch with this
comment fixed?  Or should I just remove it?

Thanks,

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html