lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:48:56 -0600
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc:	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>, "jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>,
	"sandeen@...hat.com" <sandeen@...hat.com>,
	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Deprecate data=journal mount option

On 2011-06-27, at 9:37 AM, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> wrote:

> Data journalling mode (data=journal) is known to be neglected by
> developers and only minority of people is actually using it. This
> mode is also less tested than the other two modes by the developers.
> 
> This creates a dangerous combination, because the option which seems
> *safer* is actually less safe the others. So this commit adds a warning
> message in case that data=journal mode is used, so the user is informed
> that the mode has been deprecated and we do not recommend using it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c |    4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 9ea71aa..d5a3dea 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -1631,6 +1631,10 @@ static int parse_options(char *options, struct super_block *sb,
>            sbi->s_min_batch_time = option;
>            break;
>        case Opt_data_journal:
> +            ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING,
> +                 "Using data=journal is not recommended. It "
> +                 "has been deprecated and can be removed "
> +                 "in the future");

I'd rather reword this to be something like:

Using data=journal may be removed in the future. Contact linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org if you are using this feature.

And this should at least appear in some vendor kernels (e.g. RHEL6) before we make any decision on whether to remove it.

Cheers, Andreas


>            data_opt = EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_DATA;
>            goto datacheck;
>        case Opt_data_ordered:
> -- 
> 1.7.4.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ