linux-ext4 - Re: Commit 94968e74 breaks f

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 01:09:10 -0600
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...mcloud.com>
To:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Commit 94968e74 breaks f_lotsbad

On 2011-06-28, at 8:23 AM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:16:14PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> 
>> I retested after pulling your commit 1ca87790b914a1958f3cbd8b5e1e7037f2cf30ed
>> "libext2fs: fix makefile dependency problem", but even when I do "make clean"
>> before each test I still get a failure on the "f_lotsbad" test:
> 
> I can't replicate this problem on my end.  What gcc version are you
> using, and what are your configure options?
> 
> This is what I'm using
> 
> % ./config.status --version
> config.status
> configured by ../configure, generated by GNU Autoconf 2.65,
>  with options "'--enable-elf-shlibs' '--enable-maintainer-mode' 'CFLAGS=-g' '--enable-symlink-build' '--enable-symlink-install' '--disable-libuuid' '--disable-libblkid'"
> 
> Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This config.status script is free software; the Free Software Foundation
> gives unlimited permission to copy, distribute and modify it.
> 
> % gcc --version
> gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3

I'm testing on an FC13 system, with a downgraded 2.6.32 FC12 kernel:

[root@...kie e2fsprogs-git]# git describe
v1.41.14-228-g1ca8779
[root@...kie e2fsprogs-git]# git diff
[root@...kie e2fsprogs-git]# ./config.status --version
config.status
configured by ./configure, generated by GNU Autoconf 2.65,
  with options ""

Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This config.status script is free software; the Free Software Foundation
gives unlimited permission to copy, distribute and modify it.

[root@...kie e2fsprogs-git]# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.4.5 20101112 (Red Hat 4.4.5-2)
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
[root@...kie e2fsprogs-git]# cd tests
[root@...kie tests]# make test_script
/bin/cp ./mke2fs.conf.in mke2fs.conf
Creating test_script...
[root@...kie tests]# ./test_script f_lotsbad
f_lotsbad: too many illegal blocks in inode: failed
0 tests succeeded       1 tests failed

Very strangely, the test passes on another node (older FC3 with many updates)
when run as a non-root user, though this isn't true on the original test node:

[adilger@...kie tests]$ ./test_script f_lotsbad
f_lotsbad: too many illegal blocks in inode: ok
1 tests succeeded       0 tests failed
[adilger@...kie tests]$ logout
[root@...kie e2fsprogs-git]# cd tests/
[root@...kie tests]# ./test_script f_lotsbad
f_lotsbad: too many illegal blocks in inode: failed
0 tests succeeded       1 tests failed
root@...kie tests]# su adilger
Agent pid 29339
[adilger@...kie tests]$ ./test_script f_lotsbad
f_lotsbad: too many illegal blocks in inode: ok
1 tests succeeded       0 tests failed
[adilger@...kie tests]$ ./config.status --version
config.status
configured by ./configure, generated by GNU Autoconf 2.65,
  with options "'CFLAGS=-Wall -g'"

Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This config.status script is free software; the Free Software Foundation
gives unlimited permission to copy, distribute and modify it.
[adilger@...kie tests]$ gcc -V
gcc: `-V' option must have argument
[adilger@...kie tests]$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 20050721 (Red Hat 3.4.4-2)
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Comparing the environments between user and root don't show any
(apparently) significant differences (PATH is different, but I don't
think this test uses anything outside the local e2fsck) and even
running strace the only noticeable differences are the getuid/getgid
calls, and umask (which impacts the mode on the test.img file, but
I don't think that should be relevant either).

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger 
Principal Engineer
Whamcloud, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html