linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] EXT4: Secure Delete: Zero out file data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:41:08 -0700
From:	Allison Henderson <achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] EXT4: Secure Delete: Zero out file data

On 06/30/2011 06:18 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Allison" == Allison Henderson<achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>  writes:
>
>>> Does sb_issue_zeroout() use the SCSI "write same" feature in the
>>> background?  That would avoid busying the CPU/controller/bus with
>>> writing out zeroes, which might be expensive for a large file.
>>>
> Allison>  Hmm, that's a good question, I will dig into it and see if I
> Allison>  can find out.
>
> This is a bit of an ongoing project.
>
> Unfortunately WRITE SAME is quirk central as many drives only implement
> block ranges corresponding to what RAID vendors told them they needed.
> Many of the drives I tested have internal caps at 16 or 32MB and will
> fail in interesting (i.e. not necessarily graceful) ways if given bigger
> ranges.
>
> I've been lobbying for a way for devices to report their WRITE SAME
> limit for a while. That feature finally made it into the latest SBC3
> draft. The changes required to support it went into the SCSI layer
> during the last merge window. What remains is wiring this up to
> blkdev_issue_zeroout(). I have some patches sitting in my queue that I
> hope to get polished and submitted soon.
>
> Anyway. From a filesystem perspective sb_issue_zeroout() interface is
> definitely the way to go. WRITE SAME will eventually be called if the
> device supports it.
>
Ah, I see, well that answers that question.  Thx for the through 
explanation.  :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html