| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:09:52 -0700 From: Allison Henderson <achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: aelder@....com CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v8] XFS TESTS: ENOSPC Punch Hole Test On 07/18/2011 03:09 PM, Alex Elder wrote: > On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 16:52 -0700, Allison Henderson wrote: >> This patch set adds the ENOSPC test that was used for ext4 punch hole testing. >> This test will verify that a hole can be punched even when the disk is full. >> Reserved blocks should be used to complete the operation when there is not blocks >> to further fragment the file. >> >> Because punching a hole does not always require extra blocks, there needs to >> be several iterations of punching holes, and then filling the file system to 100% >> usage before it is forced to grow the tree in order to handle the fragmentation. >> The growing of the tree is what would cause ENOSPC if not for the use of reserved blocks. > > I have reviewed both of your updated patches. They > both look good to me. I'll give it another day or > two for others to comment if they like, but unless > someone suggests changes I'll commit this for you. > > Reviewed-by: Alex Elder<aelder@....com> > Alrighty then, sounds good to me. Thanks Alex! Allison Henderson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists