linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] e2fsprogs: add 64bit-online-resize support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:42:33 -0600
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To:	Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsprogs: add 64bit-online-resize support

On 2011-08-11, at 1:10 AM, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
> This patch adds 64bit-resize support to e2fsprogs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
> ---
> lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h |    1 +
> resize/online.c      |   22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h b/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
> index 54cb3d4..4fec5db 100644
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
> @@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ struct ext4_new_group_input {
> #define EXT2_IOC_GROUP_EXTEND		_IOW('f', 7, unsigned long)
> #define EXT2_IOC_GROUP_ADD		_IOW('f', 8,struct ext2_new_group_input)
> #define EXT4_IOC_GROUP_ADD		_IOW('f', 8,struct ext4_new_group_input)
> +#define EXT4_IOC_RESIZE_FS		_IOW('f', 16, __u64)
> 
> /*
>  * Structure of an inode on the disk
> diff --git a/resize/online.c b/resize/online.c
> index 1d8d4ec..53ad852 100644
> --- a/resize/online.c
> +++ b/resize/online.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ errcode_t online_resize_fs(ext2_filsys fs, const char *mtpt,
> 				  fs->super->s_first_data_block,
> 				  EXT2_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(fs->super)),
> 		EXT2_DESC_PER_BLOCK(fs->super));
> -	printf("old desc_blocks = %lu, new_desc_blocks = %lu\n",
> +	printf("old_desc_blocks = %lu, new_desc_blocks = %lu\n",
> 	       fs->desc_blocks, new_desc_blocks);
> 	if (!(fs->super->s_feature_compat &
> 	      EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_RESIZE_INODE) &&
> @@ -69,6 +69,26 @@ errcode_t online_resize_fs(ext2_filsys fs, const char *mtpt,
> 	}
> 
> 	size=ext2fs_blocks_count(sb);
> +
> +	if (ioctl(fd, EXT4_IOC_RESIZE_FS, new_size)) {
> +		if (errno == ENOTTY) {
> +			printf("Kernel does not support 64bit-online resizing, "
> +			       "tring the old style online resizing\n");

s/tring/trying/

In any case, I don't think users care about which ioctl is in use, just
that it works correctly on the kernel they are using.  IMHO it should just
silently try both ioctls() without any extra warnings.

> +		} else {
> +			if (errno == EPERM)
> +				com_err(program_name, 0,
> +				_("Permission denied to resize filesystem"));
> +			else
> +				com_err(program_name, errno,
> +				_("While checking for on-line resizing "
> +				  "support"));
> +			exit(1);
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		close(fd);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> 	if (ioctl(fd, EXT2_IOC_GROUP_EXTEND, &size)) {
> 		if (errno == EPERM)
> 			com_err(program_name, 0,
> -- 
> 1.7.5.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Cheers, Andreas





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html