linux-ext4 - Re: EXT4-fs (dm-1): Couldn't remount RDWR because of unprocessed orphan inode list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 10 Sep 2011 22:04:14 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, mszeredi@...e.cz,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: EXT4-fs (dm-1): Couldn't remount RDWR because of unprocessed
 orphan inode list

On Fri 09-09-11 18:11:26, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 at 20:51, Jan Kara wrote:
> > There's race where VFS remount code can race with unlink and result will
> > be unlinked file in orphan list on read-only filesystem. Christian seems to
> > be hitting this race. Miklos Szeredi has patches
> > (http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1108.3/00169.html) to
> > mostly close this hole but they're waiting for Al to find time to look at
> > them / merge them AFAIK.
> 
> While these patches are still pending review, are they "dangerous" to 
> apply? If not, I'd like to volunteer as a tester :-)
  As far as I saw them, they should be pretty safe. So feel free to test
them.

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html