[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:56:15 -0700
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
Cc: "tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ext4: remove code related to punching hole from ext4_ext_insert_extent
On 2011-11-16, at 19:03, Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com> wrote:
> Punch hole should never call ext4_ext_insert_extent, so this patch
> removes code related to it from ext4_ext_insert_extent.
Is that still true if punch hole is used beyond the end of the file? I don't recall whether the semantics of this mean to extend the file size or to shrink it?
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index 6888d1a..720070d 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -1737,8 +1737,6 @@ int ext4_ext_insert_extent(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> * There is no free space in the found leaf.
> * We're gonna add a new leaf in the tree.
> */
> - if (flag & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PUNCH_OUT_EXT)
> - flags = EXT4_MB_USE_ROOT_BLOCKS;
> err = ext4_ext_create_new_leaf(handle, inode, flags, path, newext);
> if (err)
> goto cleanup;
> --
> 1.7.5.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists